Tag Archives: Film

[Archive]: Want Lucious Lips à la Angelina?

Angelina lip glossing at The Globes

Of course you do! Well, join the queue, ladies! While full lips like Angie’s may well be the envy of many, and, seemingly down to brilliant genetics, which you just can’t buy these days; aside from pricey (and scary!) filler injections, just how can you emulate Ms. Jolie?

Enter: Chantecaille. Specifically, its Brilliant Gloss in shade Love. For this is what you need to invest in, if you want to go all copycat kitten on La Jolie’s smackers. After being spotted at the Golden Globes on Sunday (January 16) night applying her lip gloss mid-ceremony, the one question on everyones’, eh, lips, was, surely, “What magical lip boosting potion lies therein?” And, her make-up artist, Toni G., has come up trumps, telling us that this  — Chantecaille’s Brilliant Gloss in Love — is Angie’s go-to shade for days spent on movie sets and nights swishing down red carpets. According to Toni, the gloss “maintains lip moisture and is fresh and sexy.”

Sounds good to us!

The shade retails for $28, but is currently sold out on Chantecaille’s website, no doubt in part due to Jolie-lip-emulating-fever, however is sure to be restocked soon to service the inevitable surge of demand brought by Angelina’s Golden Globe glossing. However, you can find similar Chantecaille products here.

Update (November 17, 2012): Chantecaille’s Brilliant Gloss in Love is now available on Chantecaille’s website, however, it has increased in price from $28 to $33, which corresponds to a hefty18% price hike. Seems like The Jolie’s lips are worth big (lip) glossing bucks.

This was originally published on January 19, 2011.

Image: NBC

Leave a comment

Filed under Archive, Celebrities, Entertainment, Facts, Hollywood

[Archive]: The SAG Awards 2011: Red Carpet Losers

For the sartorially obsessed, the die-hard style mavens and the red carpet aficionados among ye, if you live and breathe, you’ll have undoubtably oohed and aahed over the glamour and gorgeousness of the gúnas* that graced The Screen Actors Guild Awards on Sunday night. And, although there was undoubtably a peppering of prettiness in the way of fabulous frocks; unfortunately for the style watchers of the world there were definitely a few misses amongst the hits. And who among us doesn’t love to hate those dire disaster dress-zones?

On that note, may I present to you the red carpet losers of 2011’s SAG awards…

Jane Lynch

Let me begin with Jane Lynch, who’s better known as the venom-tongued Sue Sylvester, arch-nemesis of Will Schuester in happy-go-peppy high school hit, Glee. While she pulls off Adidas tracksuits like no other on the silver screen, the same cannot be said of this rather-dressier-by-several-degrees lilac number. Designed by Ali Rahimi, there’s oh-so-much wrong with Ms. Lynch’s dress that it’s hard to know where to start. But start I shall… From the swimsuit-style neckline to the overly fussy bodice; and the unnecessary draping suffocating the under-skirt to the heaviness of the fabric; it’s pretty heinous. If I had to pick a single redeeming feature, it would be the brooch on the waistline. But other than that, it gets a big F- from me.

Kate Mara

Second on our list of red carpet losers is Kate Mara, who has appeared in box office hits 127 Hours and Iron Man 2. While she may be gaining momentum as an actress, having appeared in the former and latter this year alone, this tan coloured monstrossity that she sported at the SAGS is sure to give her no leg up whatsoever as far as the style stakes go. Half bandage dress, half toilet roll cover, the split personality of this gown is not at all flattering. Or pretty. And her hair band does not help this sorry situation a single bit. In fact, it makes her look rather child-like, which is not what you want when you’re swimming amongst a veritable sea of (sometimes shark-like) sophisticated actresses at an awards do. Her look pretty much ties with Jane Lynch’s purple assault on the eyes as SAG’s most ugliest look of 2011.

Angie Harmon

Third on our list of SAG disaster zone dresses is Angie Harmon’s explosion-in-a-candy-floss-factory, pastel pink Monique Lhuillier number, which certainly grabbed my attention, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Quite frankly, it looks like the bizarre love child of a Miss Piggy cast-off and a flock of unsuspecting ostriches. Or, something the epitome-of-classiness herself (insert sarcasm sign here), Jordan would wear to court some attention from the paps at a premiere. Either way, not a good look, Angie.

Cara Buono

Another strong contender for the SAG’s worst dressed gong is Cara Buono, of Mad Men fame. She walked the red carpet in a teal J. Mendel fusspot of a gown. “Wow” is the first word that comes to mind, albeit not in a good way. There is just too, too much going on in this dress. There’s ruffles, there’s pleating and there’s ruching. Not to mention the overly complicated bodice. It’s just overkill. Less is more, Cara.

January Jones

Joining Miss Buono on this most dreaded of lists is Mad Men colleague, January Jones. To be perfectly honest, the first thing that popped into my head on seeing her decked out in Carolina Herrera was that she bore more than a passing resemblance to a surely-qualifying-as-antique coffee-soaked doily. Better luck next time, Jan.

Christina Hendricks

January and Cara weren’t the only Mad Men alum to don threads of the distinctly dodgy variety on Sunday night. Oh, no. For joining them in the sort of hat-trick one never aspires to is fellow co-star, Christina Hendricks. Usually she looks amazing and brings a bit of va va voom to red carpets with her coveted and oft-commented-on curves, so that makes her inclusion on this list all the more disappointing. But, disappointing at the SAGS she was. While she may indeed be wearing L’Wren Scott, unfortunately the belted waist, long sleeves and thigh-high split evoke visions of a dated-looking bath robe, not a couture gúna of beauty; so the copper haired actress ends up looking more ready for soaking-in-the-bath time than whirling-down-the-red-carpet time. The colour of the robe-come-dress sits too harshly against her porcelain doll-like, alabaster-toned skin, also, gurning wildly against her gently coiffed ‘do. I get that you’re trying to evoke the spirit of the Mad Men ’70’s, with the material, and in homage to the hit that’s got you at the SAGS — probably? — but, it’s just too thigh-high, aged, and ageing.

Hailee Steinfeld

Hailee Steinfeld, the up-and-coming young actress who has been critically lauded for her performance as Mattie Ross in True Grit, unfortunately is not going to be lauded for her sartorial sense any time soon, if this offering is anything to go by. And sadly, provides us with proof positive that Prada doesn’t always mean pretty. To be frank, this garish gown is nothing short of an absolute monstrosity. It looks like an overgrown pumpkin patch, a tube of fuschia lippie and a Sharpie marker got into a fistfight. And I’m not really clear which one of them won, to be honest…

Helena Bonham Carter

Let me preface this by saying, in the championing-of-over-capitalization-style-of-Caitlin-Moran, that I LOVE Helena Bonham Carter. Oh, I do LOVE HER! So, oh, how it pains me to add Helena Bonham Carter to this list. It really does. I can usually be counted on to champion her quirky, some even may say wacky, style; and to be honest I adore how she isn’t just another cookie cutter star who wears only what the fashion Gods deem to be ‘in’ that season; and how she just doesn’t seem to give a damn about what anyone thinks of her sartorial choices.

Yet here I am, adding her to yet another worst dressed list. In fairness, her monochrome Marc Jacobs pick for the SAGS pales in comparison to some of the other horrors mentioned above, but still, I can’t say I’m a fan of her red carpet look here. Overall, the dress just screams 1990s. From the thick, sheer straps to the detailing on the skirt and bodice, it just looks dated. And that fringe is doing her no favours, I’m afraid. However, on the plus side, I’m all for her Lulu Guinness clutch. But other than that, it’s a definite no from me.

Naya Rivera

Coming in last on the list is Glee‘s Naya Rivera. While by no means the worst dressed on the red carpet Sunday night, she definitely is worthy of at the least an honourable mention here, mainly due to the side-order of bolt-on boob à la Victoria Beckham’s implants -of-old, which are in no way concealed in this silver Aurelio Costarella number. Her showy display is more than a bit naff, and the metallic detailing on the bust is very breastplate-like. Next time, cover up the half-watermelon-like appendages and you might fare better in the style stakes.

Well, there you have it, style addicts. The nine most fugliest looks on the SAG red carpet of 2011. Here’s to many more dubious dress disasters to snark over in the future!
This was originally published on February 4, 2011.

Images: Google Images

Leave a comment

Filed under Archive, Celebrities, Entertainment, Hollywood

[Archive]: Johnny Depp to Play Edward Scissorhands again… But Not in the Way you Would Expect!

Are you jonesing for a Johnny Depp fix, yet struggling to balance your craving for funny, adult-appropriate cartoon shows with the grá for an altogether broody Mr. Depp? Well, have I got just the treat for you!

For Johnny is set to reprise his first real gothic role, Edward Scissorhands, (FYI: This was his debut collaboration with Tim Burton, in 1990 — can you even imagine a time when Depp and Burton were not practically synonymous with each other?!) yet not with the quirky director-come-writer-come-producer-come-artist, nor on the silver screen.

Nope, our Johnny is set to play the gentle man, juxtaposed with his set of sharp, scary, steel-y scissor hands, on the small screen, in cartoon form. On US cartoon Family Guy.

The actor is set to appear in an upcoming episode of the show, with the cameo having already been recorded. Depp is set to feature as Edward in one of the cartoon’s cutaway gags. The thespian, who initially showed a tad of trepidation insofar as getting into character mode, — per Family Guy executive producer Mark Hentemann, he,

“…felt like he hadn’t done that voice since he did it in front of the camera”

(in fairness to Johnny, it was 22 years ago!), but that after a minute,

“He was able to snap right back into Edward Scissorhands once we pulled up a clip from the movie.”

And the answer to the question that you’ve all been wondering about ever since hearing thatJohnny is set to hit a small screen near you –- does he watch Family Guy? Yep, according to Entertainment Weekly Mr. D is fan of the show, and watches episodes with his children.

I, for one, cannot wait for my next Depp installment, totes jonesing!

Will you be tuning in to see hear Johnny on Family Guy? Are you a fan of grown up cartoons? Do you love Johnny more than, say chips? Tell me all @aprilbarry101

This was originally published on July 12, 2012, and can be seen, in edited form, here.

If you would like to see all my work on Cork.Studenty.me, please click here.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Leave a comment

Filed under Archive, Celebrities, Entertainment, Hollywood

[Archive]: It’s Official: Johnny Depp has Split from Vanessa Paradis

Sad news just in from the world of showbiz — Johnny Depp has officially split from long term love Vanessa Paradis. The couple, who have been together for 14 years and who have two children together confirmed their separation today, June 19 2012, with Depp’s publicist saying,

“Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis have amicably separated. Please respect their privacy and, more importantly, the privacy of their children.”

The pair, who have never married had, up until the start of this year, been seen as one of Hollywood’s more solid couples. However, rumours of a split have been circling since January, with both Depp and Paradis said to have been leading increasingly separate lives. They also hadn’t made a joint red carpet appearance together in some time despite high profile film releases both this year and last year for Johnny –- Dark Shadows this year, and The Rum Diary in 2011. Vanessa has also been promoting her filmJe Me Suis Fait Tout Petit (I Was Made Very Small) recently. In January of this year Vanessa blasted these rumours when asked about them on French television show Grand Journal by saying,

“Yes it’s false! Of course it’s false!”

Johnny and Vanessa first met in 1998, in Paris, while Depp was filming The Ninth Gate, with Johnny saying of their first meeting,

“…I just knew, you know…”

Within just a few short months, French model-singer-actress Paradis and Depp had set up home together in France’s Côte d’Azur. They became first time parents the following year, on May 27, 1999, when they welcomed their first daughter, Lily-Rose Melody Depp into the world, in Paris. They also had a baby boy, John Christopher Depp III, who is better known as Jack, on 9 April 2002.

This relationship isn’t the first high profile one to fail for either Johnny or Vanessa -– Johnny was previously engaged to both actress Winona Ryder, and model Kate Moss. Vanessa was also said to be dating singer Lenny Kravitz in the ‘90s. Depp was also previously married to make-up artist Lori Anne Allison, from 1983 – 1985, before becoming a worldwide star.

This was originally published on June 19, 2012, and can be seen, in edited form, here.

If you would like to see all my work on Cork.Studenty.me, please click here.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Leave a comment

Filed under Archive, Celebrities, Entertainment, Hollywood

[Archive]: Miley Cyrus is Getting Spliced. Thoughts? I Got ‘Em…

Miley Cyrus is engaged, y’all!

Yes indeed, the perpetually tween-seeming starlet (in actuality she’s due to celebrate her 20th birthday in November) is set to get spliced to fellow Hollywood star and longtime boyfriend Liam Hemsworth (former Neighbours actor, currently appearing in The Hunger Games; and brother to one Kit from Home and Away Chris Hemsworth, better known these days ­­for his turn in Thor and The Avengers). The twosome have reportedly been stepping out on and off for three years , ever since meeting on the set of The Last Song in 2009.

They officially announced their intention to wed last Wednesday, June 6, with Ms. Cyrus waxing lyrical of her love, Liam,

“I’m so happy to be engaged and look forward to a life of happiness with Liam”

and later tweeting,

“I’m happy to share this news with you all. I feel like all my dreams are coming true.”

The Australian-born actor, 22, popped the question to the Nashville, Tennessee native almost a week earlier, on May 31, with a 3.5 carat diamond ring from jeweller Neil Lane.

So, thoughts. Yup, I got ‘em.  Specifically on the whole Miley-Cyrus-becoming-Mrs-Hemsworth thing. Who knew titles of articles could yield such clues to their content, eh?

Okay, just to preface –- I’m not going to hate on anyone for getting engaged. Unless it’s Vanessa Paradis, you dig, natch?! My view is, if you’re not hurting anyone, and something makes you happy, then go ahead and do it.

But, here’s my bugaboo –- Miley’s a mere 19 years old. Not actually eons younger, to my surprise, but, born in 1992, she’s all of 19 years. Ninteen! That, in my opinion, is waaay too young to be making plans to become a Mrs/donning a diamond which pre-empts marriage/familiarising yourself with wedding favours (unless you’re a wedding guest, in which case – hello! – free swag alert!). I know some people meet The One early on, and sometimes you just know, but at 19, the likelihood is that he-who-you’re-convinced-is-The-One is actually the-one-who-you’ll-make-quips-about-with-your-friends-on drunken-nights-out while painting the town years later, or laugh about how besotted and totally in lurve you thought you were when you actually do come across The all-important actual One.

Seriously, at 19 your frontal lobe, which is an area of your brain which deals with processes such as reasoning, planning, and judgment (fairly important, then, when it comes to choosing your forever-mate) is not even fully developed, and FYI, won’t be until between the ages of 25 and 30. Yep.

Putting aside the fact that Miss Miley started her professional career as an actress in Disney Channel vehicle Hannah Montana at the young age of 11, let me put this in real world terms. At the age of 19, saying, simply for the sake of argument, that you completed the much-dreaded torture fest that is the Leaving Cert at the age of 18, you’ve been out of secondary school for one year. You’ve either :

a)      Taken a year out to travel, to work, perhaps to investigate the whys and wherefores of crop circles (hey, we don’t judge here at Studenty), possibly painted murals in some far-flung place, perhaps Belize; maybe even volunteered to do something, somewhere (to be specific).

b)      Been a college bum for a year, be it in CIT, UCC, or even the sun-drenched campus of UCLA. (They are your only options, obvs. This isn’t  Studenty Galway!) If you’re a UCC Arts student who is studying English you have yet to even encounter an English seminar.

c)       You’ve been a worker bee for a year. You intrinsically know how everyone in the office takes their coffee and tea, down even to the precise shade of mahogany their caffeine-in-a-cup must resemble (must!). You’re also highly adept at handling a photocopier.

Could you imagine lasooing that little amount of real life experience with an engagement ring, no matter how sparkly and shiny the stone? I certainly couldn’t.

When I was reading up on all things Miley, I just thought there was an interesting juxtaposition on the People.com website –- featuring amongst the list of the top five most read articles were, at number number, Miley’s engagement, and, at number two, Drew Barrymore’s wedding. Now Drew, much as I love her particular unique brand of crazy-quirky-cool, could teach Miss Miley a few life lessons.

Drew Barrymore — Miss Miley could learn a lot from Drew and her former flames

See, Drew hasn’t just become a blushing bride (if you’re asking — groom: Will Kopelman, occupation: art dealer; also, the bride appears to be sporting a baby bump, but has not officially confirmed this) for the very first time at the age of 37, oh no. See, our Drew was also engaged, and consequently betrothed at the tail end of her teen years too, at 19, to be precise, the self-same age as Miley is (engaged, not wed yet). She walked down the aisle with hubs number one, bar owner Jeremy Thomas, on March 20 1994, after dating for a mere six weeks. They were joined in holy matrimony by a minister-come-psychic-come-private-detective, who they found via a 24-hour wedding hotline. The venue? The Room, the groom’s bar in Los Angeles. Their wedded bliss was not to last though, as Drew filed for divorce less than two months later.

Ms. Barrymore also got hitched a second time, this time to Canadian comic Tom Green, in the year 2000. Having had a slightly longer courtship pre-engagement and ringing-of-wedding-bells –- they were engaged for about a year before they wed; the union only lasted for less than half a year -– five months, to be exact. The blushing bride was 26 (both as a bride and on becoming a divorcee the second time over). See, that frontal lobe is oh-so-important! Hopefully the third time will be the charm for dear Drew, the doyenne of rom-coms.

Miley, are you listening yet?!

Okay, so Miss Cyrus and Mr. Hemsworth have, in fairness, been going out for longer than Drew went out with her previous hubbies before they became husband and wife. As I said, on and off for three years, since the songstress-come-actress was 16, her Australian other half 19. It’s not the exact same situation, but still, it does add weight to my argument that 19 is still Way Too Young to wed.

Plus, if Drew’s story isn’t enough to sway you on the issue of an engagement at 19, how about all the other Hollywood starlets insisting on doing things So Damn Fast? I’m a bit perturbed by it all, to be honest.

Britney Spears, who got married at 22

Take Britney Spears, for example. She’s set to become a bride for the third time too, like Drew, at the age of 30, to Jason Trawick. Her first marriage, which lasted a grand total of 55 hours, was to childhood friend Jason Alexander at the tender age of 22. They wed in a quickie Las Vegas ceremony in 2004, the union later being annulled. Her second spin on the marriage merry-go-round was to Kevin Federline, a then-backup dancer. They got together reportedly while his girlfriend, actress Shar Jackson (you might know her from Moesha), was pregnant with his second child. Brit and Kev married in October 2004, making Britney both a bride for the second time in one year, and for a second time at the age of 22. The marriage, which produced two children -– Sean Preston, 11 months post wedding, and Jayden James, ONE YEAR later (what’s that I was telling you about frontal lobes, planning?!) lasted just shy of three years.

Christina Aguilera — also engaged and wed young

Also, fellow former New Mickey Mouse Club cast member Christina Aguilera married young too, to record producer Jordan Bratman –- becoming a bride in 2005 at the age of 24. She also became a Mom to son Max Liron Bratman at the age of 27; and had been a wife, become a Mom, and was also (are you sensing a theme yet?) a separated lady, all by the age of 29.

Jessica Simpson — the one time “Newlywed” was divorced from former hubs, Nick Lachey, in her twenties

Jessica Simpson is another pop star casualty of the celebrity Marrying Much Too Young club. She became engaged in 2002 at 21 to then 98 Degrees lead singer, and the pair tied the knot when Jess was but a tender 22 years old. In November 2005, Simpson and Lachey announced they were separating. By the time Jessica had turned 25, the separation had been finalised. She went on to file for divorce in December 2005. Lo and behold, Miss Simpson was a divorcee before she even blew 26 candles out on a birthday cake. She is currently engaged to Eric Johnson, and gave birth to his child, Maxwell Drew Johnson on May 1. Hopefully the second time ’round will be the trick for Jessica.

Ashlee Simpson, back when her tresses were of a red hue — another starlet who did it all a little too fast

Smaller sis’, Ashlee Simpson is yet another Hollywood starlet who’s carried on the trend of doing things So Damn Fast. The singer and actress became engaged to musician Pete Wentz at 22; married and two weeks later confirmed to be pregnant by the age of 23. Simpson became a mama at 23, giving birth to son Bronx Mowgli. The Mowgli part of their son’s name was apparently inspired by The Jungle Book. Predictably enough, their union hit the rocks 2 ½ years after the wedding, with Jess’ lil’ sis filing for divorce in February 2009, at 24 years old. She’s a divorcee by 25.

Suffice to say, hotfooting it to the engagement ring jeweller de jour, and marathon-ing it up the aisle in your teens or twenties does not seem to have panned out for these Hollywood stars. Take note, Miley.

And on that note, take a year out, go travelling, maybe consider studying crop circles, do whatever (again, to be specific!). Be a normal 19 year old. Have some fun, and be a teen. Save the serious talk of marriage until you’re at least 30. Your frontal lobe will thank you kindly.

Learn from your fellow stars’ mistakes. You’ve got years for all the rest!

This was originally published on June 14, 2012, and can be seen, in edited form, here.

If you would like to see all my work on Cork.Studenty.me, please click here.

Images: Wikimedia Commons

Leave a comment

Filed under Archive, Celebrities, Entertainment, Hollywood, Psychology